Indonesia’s Quiet Success Explained > Articles

Skip to container

팝업레이어 알림

팝업레이어 알림이 없습니다.

A JOURNAL OF THE EAST ASIA FOUNDATION GO TO WWW.KEAF.ORG

사이트 내 전체검색
Articles
Indonesia’s Quiet Success Explained
By Salil Tripathi

 

Often called the world’s largest “invisible” country, Indonesia has a magical hold on foreign correspondents who have reported out of the archipelago. As if to make up for that invisibility, many of the journalists, all privileged temporary residents with the ringside view of a correspondent, have written excellent accounts of their time in Indonesia, interpreting the complex country by demystifying it. With its wayang kulit (shadow puppetry) and dalangs (puppeteers), dwifungsi (the military’s dual function under former leader Suharto), dukuns (spirit mediums) and gotong royong (tradition of mutual self-help), there is much that’s enchanting, magical and exotic in Indonesian society to be explained to the uninitiated.

 

My former colleagues at the now-defunct Far Eastern Economic Review — Hamish McDonald, Adam Schwarz, Michael Vatikiotis, John McBeth and Sadanand Dhume — as well as epidemiologist Elizabeth Pisani, who was formerly a Reuters correspondent in Indonesia, have written knowledgeably and perceptively about the world’s most populous Muslim-majority nation. To that list, now add Vasuki Shastry, a former correspondent for Singapore’s Business Times and later an official at the International Monetary Fund, who is now a senior bank executive in London but has stayed engaged with Indonesian and Asian economic affairs.

 

Shastry’s account, Resurgent Indonesia, is actually two books in one. He has seen Indonesia from two perspectives: first, as a reporter covering the most important story of Indonesia in the past quarter century — the 1997-98 financial crisis and Suharto’s fall, which I too witnessed and covered for the Review; and later, as an IMF official when the fund was designing policies and programs to help Indonesia overcome the crisis. Three threads run through Shastry’s writing: his affection for the Indonesian people; his thoughtful critique of what went wrong; and his reliance on economic evidence to advance his analysis and argument.

 

We see two distinct narratives in the book — the color and drama Shastry saw as a reporter, and his work as a participant after he became an international bureaucrat. He does the former with a keen eye; he does the latter by quoting widely from analytical reports, academic papers and speeches. The reports he cites are not written as engagingly as he himself writes, which slows the pace of the text; it springs to life again once Shastry writes in his own voice.

 

I vividly recall the day Suharto resigned in Jakarta, 20 years ago in May 1998. I was with my colleague and friend, the Jakarta-based correspondent John McBeth on the terrace of Wisma Antara, the building where the Review had its office, surveying the city sprawled around us. There were flames everywhere, from Glodok, West Jakarta’s Chinatown, to the shopping centers in the east, as protesters attacked businesses close to Suharto, or the property of Indonesian-Chinese, who the demonstrators believed had disproportionately benefited during Suharto’s rule.

 

Shastry recalls that period with calm prose, not missing any of the drama while recounting the Indonesia’s very real economic crisis. Indeed, its political crisis was the consequence of an economic one, and Shastry’s account vividly recreates the slow-motion disaster. He writes about the origins of the crisis (the mismatch between the banking system’s assets and liabilities, and the impossibility of maintaining a fixed exchange rate at a time of increasing private, short-term debt repayments), linking those to the political ramifications brought on by a crony-infested economy; all compounded by the El Niño weather effect that led to a fall in food production. Together, these forces destroyed the Suharto presidency.

 

Shastry is critical of the cynicism within Suharto’s inner circle. Some businesses and politicians close to Suharto tried to manipulate domestic and international opinion as they sought to preserve their own assets, even if that meant the national crisis would worsen and the poor would suffer more. Shastry gives the benefit of the doubt to many characters who turned up in Jakarta, including the currency board evangelist Steve Hanke, who offered his one-size-fits-all solution (a fixed currency rate) without realizing that the government’s excitement over his plans were not out of any belief in his economic theories, but to transfer the wealth of businesses close to Suharto into dollarized assets at a more affordable exchange rate. (The rupiah had fallen to nearly 17,000 to the dollar, down from around 2,250 to the dollar before the crisis. Fixing it at 5,000 rupiah to the dollar would make such a transfer more affordable, reducing their losses).

 

Shastry is also generous toward Suharto’s controversial successor, the technologist-turned-politician, B.J. Habibie, who briefly thought he could complete Suharto’s term. He doesn’t look kindly towards Habibie’s ambitions, but credits him with leaving the political scene when he realized he was no longer wanted, instead of prolonging his stay, and for setting in motion the decentralization drive that enhanced the powers of the regions and cities, loosening the control Jakarta exercised over the country without giving enough power to the provinces to fuel separatism.

 

That Indonesia didn’t break up in the aftermath of the crisis is an important point. In his 1993 book, An Empire of the East, the British writer Norman Lewis focused on the fissures within Indonesia, writing about Sumatra (Aceh, in particular), East Timor, and Irian Jaya (now known as West Papua), three provinces that many analysts thought would secede at some point. East Timor did, in 1999, and rightly so; a former Portuguese colony, East Timor was annexed by Indonesia in 1975, when the Portuguese left; its independence after a quarter century was inevitable. But Indonesia has defied doomsayers who felt the country would be torn asunder after Suharto’s fall.

 

Indeed, in the past two decades, the Indonesian economy has grown, its social indicators have improved and its politics has shown almost dull normalcy, with free elections and orderly transfers of power. Shastry says this is not surprising if you understand what he calls the “Indonesia Rules,” which are drawn from the country’s under-appreciated strengths.

 

It is possible, he writes, “to build a modern, democratic state from the ashes of dictatorship,” a lesson clearly lost on the Middle East. Indonesian democracy, he says, with presidential term limits, a “raucous parliament which acts as a counter-balance to presidential power” and decentralization of power from Jakarta offers a model for large, diverse countries.

 

The second rule: that it is possible to be the world’s largest Muslim-majority nation and adapt well to globalization. Shastry stresses the Indonesian brand of syncretic Islam that the academic Clifford Geertz characterized as abangan, as opposed to the more militant santri. That inclusiveness is the antidote to ancient hatreds that pit people against one another.

 

The third rule: you don’t need hostile rhetoric to prove your leadership credentials. That resonates beyond Southeast Asia, although in the regional context, it applies to Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte more than any other neighbor. But in a world dominated by strongmen as leaders — witness Donald Trump in the United States, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan in Turkey, Vladimir Putin in Russia, Narendra Modi in India, and Viktor Orbán in Hungary — Indonesia’s quiet, gentle President Joko Widodo offers a refreshing contrast. None of the four post-Suharto presidents (Habibie, Abdurrahman Wahid, Megawati Sukarnoputri and Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono) believed in projecting personality or power, and Jokowi, as the current president is popularly known, is no exception.

 

And the fourth rule: Shastry says Indonesia demonstrates that modernity and tradition can peacefully coexist in a nation of 260 million, reminding the reader of the blended, interwoven traditions of Indonesia, where Islam coexists with Hinduism, Buddhism and Christianity.

 

To be sure, Indonesia has extremist fundamentalism and potent Islamist forces, and Shastry’s view may seem rosy to some. Since the Bali bombing of 2002, in which 202 people died and 240 were injured, there have been eight major terrorist incidents in Indonesia, killing nearly 100 and injuring about 600 people. Indonesia still has stifling blasphemy rules, under which Jakarta’s ethnic-Chinese and Christian governor, Basuki Tjahaja Purnama, known as Ahok, has been jailed. While the prejudice against the Chinese in Indonesia has diminished, it hasn’t disappeared. And yet there haven’t been any incidents of mass violence of the kind that threatened Indonesian unity in the 1960s.

 

Shastry’s central premise is optimistic. Few analysts would have been surprised had the Indonesian nation-state crumbled in 1998. Not only did that not happen, the nation cohered without a strong, authoritarian leader suspending liberties. Instead, Indonesia consolidated and widened its democracy. This does not rule out the return of a strongman — Suharto’s former son-in-law, the mercurial retired general Prabowo Subianto, who lost the 2014 presidential election, may harbor ambitions to return. And yet, by proving the Cassandras wrong, Indonesia has shown that peaceful coexistence, a feel-good term that Sukarno, the country’s first president, spoke about in Indonesia’s early years, is not a mere slogan. Its quiet success needs to be known more widely because it offers a reason for hope in an international environment that seems so bleak. Indonesia, Shastry says, is “an archipelago of possibility,” and that is an achievement worthy of applause.

 

Salil Tripathi is a writer based in London. He was a correspondent for magazines including the Far Eastern Economic Review in Singapore and Hong Kong between 1991 and 1999.

Back to Issue
    Resurgent Indonesia: From Crisis to Confidence By Vasuki Shastry Straits Times Press, 2018, 194 pages, $35 (Paperback)
    Published: Jun 22, 2018
    About the author

    Salil Tripathi is a writer based in London. He was a correspondent for magazines including the Far Eastern Economic Review in Singapore and Hong Kong between 1991 and 1999.

    Download print PDF

List

No Reply


About Us Latest Issue Back Issues Article Search How to Subscribe Advertise with Us Submit an Article Forum Privacy Policy
Global Asia, The East Asia Foundation,
4th Fl, 116 Pirundae-ro, Jongno-gu,
Seoul, Korea 03035
Business Registration Number: 105-82-14071
Representative: Ro-myung Gong
Tel. +82 2 325 2604
General: info@globalasia.org
Editorial: editorial@globalasia.org
Subscribe: subscriptions@globalasia.org
Advertising: ads@globalasia.org
This website
© 2016 by the
East Asia Foundation.
All rights reserved.
EAST ASIA FOUNDATION